Sensationalism
has become synonymous with the Indian Media, especially Television. In 2008
during the coverage of 26/11 terrorist attack in Mumbai, Barkha Dutt, India’s
known journalist, received flak from several sections of the society for her
overzealous reporting style. Critics blamed her for ignoring the ethics of
journalism by making the coverage dramatic. Similarly, during the 2015 Nepal
earthquake Indian Media was criticized for its insensitive coverage of the
incident. #GoHomeIndianMedia was ‘trending’ then to express people’s outrage
against the Indian media.
Shift from Voice of the
People to Voice of the Governance
Media
is one of the four pillars of a vibrant democracy and India can be proud to own
freedom of Press. TV news channels evolved from a single Doordarshan, which
telecasted a five minute news bulletin in 1965, to a total number of 397 news
and current affairs channels in 2014, most of which have 24/7 news broadcast.
However, the presence of these many players has obviously led to cut- throat
competition. Higher TRP ensured sustainability which eventually increased the
company’s profitability. This has shifted the focus to sensationalism rather
than credibility of the news. Journalists take advantage of India’s love for
sentiments and emotions to spread propaganda.
In
the beginning, news channels were considered as a credible source of ground
reporting that provided ‘information’ to people. The inferences and judgement
of the news were left to the conscience of the viewers. However, that is not
the case now. Today’s journalists and anchors usually go beyond the scope of
just ‘reporting’ the news by giving their personal verdict of the matter,
giving the viewers very little space to think on their own. Anchors of debates
act more like judges rather than mere mediators. The inclination of media
houses towards certain political parties and business houses have given rise to
biased-journalism. They have been used as tools to influence and tweak people’s
thoughts. Political parties and corporate houses use them to increase their
vote-bank and market value respectively.
Social Media in
Journalism
Internet
especially the social media has re-defined Journalism. More and more people
depend on social media for breaking news. They serve as a platform to read
about different perspectives. Also, the prevalence of blogging, Facebook and
Twitter has given rise to citizen journalism wherein even a common man has an
option to report, criticize and comment on topics. This has made the
traditional media more accountable about what they broadcast. Any hypocrisy,
prejudice or bias shown in their reporting immediately gets mocked and shamed
on the Social Media. Example: the Indian cricket fans used the #ShameOnTimesNow
hashtag to slam Times Now channel for sensationalizing Team India’s defeat at
the previous World-Cup.
Journalism is what maintains democracy. It’s the force for
progressive social change.
-ANDREW VACHSS
Evolution
is inevitable in any industry, with media being no exception. However, the
purpose of evolution should not bypass a collective cause. India has many
serious issues that require attention, like poverty, corruption, illiteracy
etc. Jessica Lal Murder case is an example of how the media can play an
influential role towards social causes. Power of media together with the
support of citizens can be a threat to anyone who brings hindrance to the country’s
growth.